Autonomy Reconsidered: A Proposal to Abandon the Language of Self- And Other-Control And to Adopt the Language of “Attunement”

Date created
Author: Bai, Heesoon
In this exploratory essay, I shall question the moral status of the notion of autonomy and its attendant notion of self-control. I will argue that autonomy as it is usually understood, namely having control over oneself and one's environment, is a morally problematic notion because control implies negation and suppression of the "other" (eveing if the other is none other than aspects of oneself). I shall further argue that thinking of autonomy not in terms of control but in terms of "attunement" will answer my concerns about autonomy and provide a conceptualization of the more integrated and harmonious moral agency. What I propose then is a change of our moral vocabulary and its attendant ways of thinking.
Published as
Bai, H. (1998). Autonomy reconsidered. In S. Tozer (Ed.), Philosophy of Education 1998, 95–101. Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
Publication details
Publication title
Philosophy of Education 1998
Document title
Autonomy reconsidered
S. Tozer
Philosophy of Education Society
First page
Last page
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s) with limited rights held by the publisher of the final publication.
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit this work under the following conditions: You must give attribution to the work (but not in any way that suggests that the author endorses you or your use of the work); You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Member of collection