Author: Kurytnik, Karen Patricia
This study describes resilience (and non-resilience) processes in nine adolescents adopted between 9.5 and 24 months of age from Romanian orphanages between 1990 and 1991. The study was carried out using a qualitative case study methodology incorporating data from assessments at four time periods—at 11 months post-adoption, age 4.5, age 10.5, and age 16.5. The data were analyzed using a code and sort procedure similar to the one described by Bogdan and Biklen (1992). Case studies regarding the participants’ pathways to resilience (or non-resilience) were categorized according to the ecological framework (Ungar, Lee, Callaghan, & Boothroyd, 2005; Ungar & the International Resilience Project Team, 2006) that guides this study. This framework includes: Individual factors, Relationships factors, Community contexts, Cultural factors, and Physical ecology factors. Findings indicate that participants’ pathways to resilience were influenced by: (1) Individual factors, including pro-social character traits (e.g., being caring, thoughtful, and sensitive to others’ feelings), positive self-esteem, and a sense of ‘well-roundedness’ that manifested itself in a variety of interests including academic, athletic, musical, and social pursuits; (2) Relationship factors, including early positive attachments with adoptive parents, consistent caregiving by stay-at-home parents in the early childhood years, family structure whereby participants received a lot of individual attention, low levels of parenting stress, and positive peer relationships; (3) Community factors, including services that met the families’ needs, part-time employment opportunities that fostered a sense of responsibility and confidence in one’s abilities, and positive school environments whereby individual needs were met; and (4) Cultural factors, including a sense of ‘ease’ with adoption history, and religious affiliation. Relationship factors seemed to be the most important influence in the participants’ pathways to resilience; and physical ecology factors the least important. Individual variation was considered throughout the analyses in order to not lose sight of the complexity of resilience processes.
Copyright is held by the author.
The author has not granted permission for the file to be printed nor for the text to be copied and pasted. If you would like a printable copy of this thesis, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Member of collection