Skip to main content

Quantitative authorship attribution: A history and an evaluation of techniques

Resource type
Thesis type
(Thesis) M.A.
Date created
2005
Authors/Contributors
Abstract
I here present a history of the field of quantitative authorship attribution and an evaluation of its techniques. The basic assumption of quantitative authorship attribution is that the author of a text can be selected from a set of possible authors by comparing the values of textual measurements in that text to their corresponding values in each author's writing sample. Over the centuries, many measurements have been proposed, but never before have the majority of these measurements been tested on the same dataset. Until now investigators of authorship have not known which measurements are the best indicators of authorship. Such information is crucial if our current techniques are to be used effectively and if new more powerhl techniques are to be developed. Based on the results of this study, I propose that the best approach to quantitative authorship attribution involves the analysis of many different types of textual measurements.
Document
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author.
Permissions
The author has not granted permission for the file to be printed nor for the text to be copied and pasted. If you would like a printable copy of this thesis, please contact summit-permissions@sfu.ca.
Scholarly level
Language
English
Member of collection
Download file Size
etd1721.pdf 2 MB

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 77
Downloads: 3