Skip to main content

Relationship rhetoric: Representations of intimacy in contemporary self-help literature

Resource type
Thesis type
(Dissertation) Ph.D.
Date created
2007
Authors/Contributors
Abstract
Western culture is infatuated by stories and images of romance at the same time that it is alarmed by a perceived disintegration of the institution of marriage. Relationship guides (self-help books on relationships) play a role in reflecting and reinforcing both the infatuation and the alarm. This discourse analysis of ten popular relationship guides, along with interviews of 21 readers, provides an in-depth analysis of how the genre works at the rhetorical level. Although authors employ various methods to assert their credibility, interviews with readers suggest what is most important is the ability to persuade the reader that the author genuinely cares about improving relationships. Readers seem to have a somewhat ambiguous relationship with the books, sometimes treating them as true advice manuals and sometimes treating them more like novels. They are skeptical of the genre (and of authors’ motives) at the same time that they maintain hope that the next book will provide the answer they are looking for. Authors use various metaphors that allow for descriptions of marital issues as minor problems (e.g., bumps in the road) as well as providing for alluring and captivating descriptions of marital bliss. Several common terministic screens filter perceptions of marriage in a way that highlights individual responsibility and obscures any notions of social or political responsibility. Ultimately, relationship guides are a rhetorical response to a situation of failure. They provide consolation and comfort (an aspect that readers identified as very important) as well as compensation (techniques for reconciling the failure and pointing readers in directions that will make them feel more successful). Relationship guides both reflect and reinforce the discourse of the good wife – a discourse that naturalizes the unequal gender division of responsibility for maintaining a good marriage. This is seen particularly in the genre’s major godterm acceptance, which, through rhetorical methods that may not be consciously used by authors, deflects attention from expectations of change by husbands or society. Thus, although the reader may obtain comfort and a sense of shared misery from reading the books, she remains isolated in her problems.
Document
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author.
Permissions
The author has not granted permission for the file to be printed nor for the text to be copied and pasted. If you would like a printable copy of this thesis, please contact summit-permissions@sfu.ca.
Scholarly level
Supervisor or Senior Supervisor
Thesis advisor: Coe, Richard M.
Language
English
Member of collection
Download file Size
etd3211.pdf 13.78 MB

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 43
Downloads: 1