Skip to main content

Stereotype threat and interpersonal interactions: Implications for cross-gender selection interviews

Resource type
Thesis type
(Thesis) M.A.
Date created
2007
Authors/Contributors
Abstract
This study aimed to expand research on stereotype threat into the domain of intergroup interactions by manipulating fear of appearing sexist for male participants interviewing female participants in a mock selection interview. Males were instructed to avoid sexist behaviour, or not. Following the interview, participants completed self- and partner-ratings of social skills and interview skills. Counter to a stereotype threat prediction, males under threat rated their social skills more positively than males in the control condition. This positive effect did not spread to females. Male ratings of female performance were further moderated by desire to respond without sexism. The findings are discussed with reference to a model of intergroup contact. Pro-diversity norms, familiarity with the outgroup, ease of task, contrast effects, and beliefs regarding the controllability of behaviour may have increased motivation and self-efficacy so that males under threat were able to successfully modulate their behaviour.
Document
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author.
Permissions
The author has not granted permission for the file to be printed nor for the text to be copied and pasted. If you would like a printable copy of this thesis, please contact summit-permissions@sfu.ca.
Scholarly level
Language
English
Member of collection
Download file Size
etd3183.pdf 2.97 MB

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 15
Downloads: 0