Resource type
Thesis type
(Research Project) M.B.A.: Global Asset and Wealth Management Program
Date created
2010-09-02
Authors/Contributors
Author: Leggatt, Michael
Author: Havlena, Pavel
Abstract
Mean-variance optimization, in theory a very powerful and intuitive tool, has failed to provide meaningful solutions in practical settings, and indeed, in theoretical settings in much past research. Whereas inaccurate statistical estimates for inputs provide even more erroneous outputs, the modeling errors determine outputs that are nothing short of extreme. In this study, we employ two different models based on the mean-variance framework, with one portfolio seeking the highest return given a risk target while the other portfolio seeks the lowest risk given a desired level of return. In unconstrained form, our results confirm to be acutely departed from past experience in this subject matter and contrary to the known literature on modeling errors, our portfolios remain solvent. In constrained form, our portfolios outperform the benchmark and market portfolios while maintaining at least some diversification; in unconstrained form, our portfolios provide surprisingly high absolute and risk adjusted returns with betas less than the benchmark and market portfolios.
Document
Description
Research Project (M.B.A.) - Simon Fraser University
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author.
Scholarly level
Supervisor or Senior Supervisor
Thesis advisor: Grauer, Robert
Language
English
Member of collection
Download file | Size |
---|---|
GAWM 2008 Havlena, P. Leggatt, M..pdf | 2.04 MB |