Resource type
Date created
2023-12-03
Authors/Contributors
Author (aut): Zickfeld, Kirsten
Author (aut): MacIsaac, Alexander J.
Author (aut): Canadell, Josep G.
Author (aut): Fuss, Sabine
Author (aut): Jackson, Robert
Author (aut): Jones, Chris
Author (aut): Lohila, Annalea
Author (aut): Matthews, H. Damon
Author (aut): Peters, Glen
Author (aut): Rogelj, Joeri
Author (aut): Zaehle, Sönke
Abstract
Commitments to net zero carbon dioxide (CO2) or greenhouse gas emission targets now cover 88% of countries’ emissions. Underlying the accounting behind net zero frameworks is the assumption that emissions can be balanced with removals such that their net climate effect is zero. However, when considering the full climate impacts of CO2 emissions and removals, there are reasons to expect that the two are not equivalent in terms of their climate outcomes. We identify potential contributors to non-equivalence, including impermanence, biophysical and non-CO2 greenhouse gas effects, and argue that these non-equivalencies need to be accounted for to achieve climate goals. Given key uncertainties about the full climate impact of CO2 removal, it is prudent to prioritize emission reductions over removals.
Document
Identifier
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-023-01862-7
Publication details
Publication title
Nature Climate Change
Document title
Net-zero approaches must consider Earth system impacts to achieve climate goals
Publisher
Springer Nature
Date
2023-12-03
Volume
13
First page
1298
Last page
1305
Publisher DOI
10.1038/s41558-023-01862-7
Published article URL
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the publisher with many rights continuing to also be held by the author(s).
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Yes
Member of collection
Download file | Size |
---|---|
Net_zero_perspective_summit.pdf | 830.79 KB |