Resource type
Date created
2024-04-23
Authors/Contributors
Author: Moustafa, Tamir
Abstract
From 1965 to 2020, the National Science Foundation constituted the single largest funding source for political science research. As such, the NSF played a central role in defining the cutting-edge of our discipline. This study draws on historical records of the American Political Science Association to examine the political and administrative contexts that shaped the funding priorities of the NSF Political Science Program. Additionally, the study presents a new dataset and analysis of the nearly three thousand projects funded over the 55-year life of the program. The dataset shows that NSF funding was principally channeled toward quantitative research, whereas qualitative methods received little support, and work advancing normative, critical, or interpretive approaches received virtually no support. The archival record and awards-level data make visible the material forces that shaped knowledge production, and they underline the NSF’s instrumental role in consolidating behavioralism and marginalizing non-positivist approaches. The study sheds new light on the history of the discipline and helps to contextualize some of the distinctive features of American political science.
Document
Description
Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MDIHJI
Identifier
DOI: 10.1017/S1537592724000057
Publication details
Publication title
Perspectives on Politics
Document title
Political Science as a Dependent Variable: The National Science Foundation and the Shaping of a Discipline
Date
2024-04-23
Publisher DOI
10.1017/S1537592724000057
Published article URL
Rights (standard)
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Yes
Member of collection
Download file | Size |
---|---|
Moustafa-Political_Science_as_a_Dependent_Variable.pdf | 2.46 MB |