Resource type
Thesis type
(Project) M.A.
Date created
2022-08-25
Authors/Contributors
Author: McPherson, Carter
Abstract
Conservative Calgary consistently elects un-conservative mayors. Despite a mostly Conservative and right-wing electorate, right-wing mayoral candidates with Conservative Party ties consistently lose to moderate and un-conservative candidates. This voting pattern contradicts arguments against the localist thesis that suggest partisanship and ideology as primary influences on municipal voting. This paper uses data on the 2017 elections from the Canadian Municipal Election Study and Canadian Election Study and qualitative data from news sources for regression and qualitative analysis, testing the possibility that Calgary's non-partisan electoral system, vote splitting, and whether Conservative Calgarians being influenced by moderate operational ideology explain Calgary's deviant voting patterns. Testing the last explanation, this paper examines whether this moderate operational ideology is unique to municipal elections, consistent with the localist thesis, or if Conservative and right-wing Calgarians are operationally moderate across electoral levels. I conclude that Calgarians are somewhat influenced by moderate operational ideology in municipal elections.
Document
Extent
103 pages.
Identifier
etd22100
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Supervisor or Senior Supervisor
Thesis advisor: de Rooij, Eline A.
Language
English
Member of collection
Download file | Size |
---|---|
etd22100.pdf | 1.81 MB |