As computational resources have become faster and more economical, scientific research has transitioned from using only physical experiments to using simulationbased exploration. A body of literature has since grown aimed at the design and analysis of so-called computer experiments. While this literature is large and active, little work has been focused on comparing methods. This project presents ways of comparing and evaluating both design and emulation methods for computer experiments. Using a suite of test functions — in this work we introduce the Virtual Library of Computer Experiments a procedure is established which can provide guidance as to how to proceed in simulation problems. An illustrative comparison is performed for each context; putting three emulators, then four experimental designs up against each other; while also highlighting possible considerations for test function choice.
Copyright is held by the author(s).
This thesis may be printed or downloaded for non-commercial research and scholarly purposes.
Supervisor or Senior Supervisor
Thesis advisor: Bingham, Derek
Member of collection