Skip to main content

The effect of imposition on children making, granting and refusing requests

Resource type
Thesis type
(Thesis) M.A.
Date created
2006
Authors/Contributors
Abstract
Through the use of social acts (e.g., excuses, justifications and pauses) adults preserve relationships, ‘smooth the waters’ and signal the potential inconvenience of an upcoming request. Claims have been made that adults use more social acts when making requests of high versus low imposition. When granting requests, adults are generally brief, whereas refusing often involves excuses, justifications, ‘er’s’, ‘um’s’ and apologies, etc. which serve to soften the blow of the refusal. To explore whether children will perform in this differential manner typical of adults, 114 children aged 5 – 13 years made and responded to requests of varying imposition. Analysis of transcripts showed that children used more total acts and more different acts when making high versus low imposition requests and when refusing requests versus granting requests. Older children used more acts and more different acts than younger children.
Document
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author.
Permissions
The author has not granted permission for the file to be printed nor for the text to be copied and pasted. If you would like a printable copy of this thesis, please contact summit-permissions@sfu.ca.
Scholarly level
Language
English
Member of collection
Download file Size
etd2416.pdf 444.5 KB

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 0
Downloads: 0