Skip to main content

Achieving Holistic Care for Refugees: the Experiences of Educators and Other Stakeholders in Surrey and Greater Vancouver, Canada

Resource type
Date created
2021-05-14
Authors/Contributors
Abstract
In 2020, the global number of refugees reached record levels, pressuring asylum countries to determine more effective methods for facilitating integration.  This paper explores an array of stakeholder practices towards refugees in Surrey and Greater Vancouver, Canada.  It is based on questionnaires and interviews that elicit the perceptions and struggles of 40 settlement workers, health and mental health professionals, members of parliament, educators, librarians, scholars and grassroots organizations, who work with refugees. The findings show that stakeholders often feel isolated, 'working in silos' and wasting time and money due to uncoordinated services and a lack of interagency communication.  They feel it is also unreasonable to expect Government-Assisted Refugees (GARs) to learn English and complete job training in preparation for independent living within one year of support.  Both refugee adults and children suffer from high levels of trauma, often compounded by interrupted or no schooling.  Since education is essential to refugee success, I argue that teachers play a role in filling the gap, often uniquely positioned to form ongoing, safe and trusting relationships with refugee students, and their families.  For many teachers, it is an ethos of care, compassion and social justice acquired in teacher education programmes that increases refugee resilience, sense of belonging and wellbeing.  This paper identifies what new collaborations between teachers and other stakeholders might accomplish, including communication back to government policymakers.  Recommendations encompass initiating online registries of services and low-cost housing in neighbourhoods where community schools and services are interlinked, possibly achieving holistic care for all refugees. 
Description
Due to Wiley Publishing's embargo period of 18 months, this paper will not be available until December 2022. Please email summit@sfu.ca if you require access prior to December 2022. 
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Yes
Language
English
Member of collection

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 0
Downloads: 0