Skip to main content

Storage End Effects: An Evaluation of Common Storage Modelling Assumptions

Resource type
Date created
2019-11-11
Authors/Contributors
Author: Niet, Taco
Abstract
High temporal resolution modelling of energy systems often requires modelling a number of sub-periods, with the end condition of one sub-period being used to seed the next. When storage is modelled a challenge is to keep the model from draining the stored energy at the end of each sub-period. A common approach is to model extra-long sub-periods and to discard this end effect, increasing computation time. Another approach is to require refilling for each sub-period but this introduces a stored energy jump between sub-periods. This paper compare these methods to the alternative of assigning a monetary value to the stored energy at the end of each sub-period using an economic dispatch energy system model. Overall, effective storage modelling is challenging and both the choice of model structure and the value of stored energy impacts storage operation.
Description
The full text of this paper will be available in February, 2022 due to the embargo policies of Journal of Energy Storage. Contact summit@sfu.ca to enquire if the full text of the accepted manuscript can be made available to you.
Identifier
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2019.101050
Published as
Niet, T. (2020). Storage end effects: An evaluation of common storage modelling assumptions. Journal of Energy Storage, 27, 101050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.101050.
Publication details
Publication title
Journal of Energy Storage
Document title
Storage End Effects: An Evaluation of Common Storage Modelling Assumptions
Date
2020
Volume
27
Issue
101050
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Yes
Language
English
Member of collection

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 0
Downloads: 0