Throughout the second half of the twentieth century, one Muslim-majority country after another adopted constitutional provisions meant to incorporate Islam into the legal order. In what is now a familiar pattern, leaders sought to harness the legitimating power of Islamic symbolism. But rather than shore up state legitimacy, these provisions opened new avenues of contestation.In countries where judicial institutions are robust, religion of the state clauses have helped to catalyze a “judicialization of religion,” wherein courts were made to authorize an “official” religion and/or render judgment on the appropriate place for religion in the political order. This study theorizes one aspect of the judicialization of religion through the illustrative case study of Malaysia. The study examines how shifting political context provided opportunities for activist lawyers to advance sweeping new interpretations of Malaysia’s Religion of the Federation clause and, with it, a new vision for state and society.
The full text of this paper will be available in October 2020 due to the embargo policies of Law & Society Review. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org to enquire if the full text of the accepted manuscript can be made available to you.
The Judicialization of Religion” Law & Society Review, vol. 52 (2018) 685-708. DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12350
Law & Society Review
The Judicialization of Religion
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Member of collection