Assuming Epistemic Authority, or Becoming a Thinking Thing

Resource type
Date created
2018-09-20
Authors/Contributors
Abstract
François Poulain de la Barre, Françoise D’Aubigné, Madame de Maintenon and Gabrielle Suchon deploy the Cartesian idea that human beings are essentially thinking things to offer arguments for women’s education in the latter half of seventeenth century, confronting the substantive epistemic injustice of the devaluation of women’s rational capacity. In considering how to realize the natural equality of men and women, and face and address the practical challenge of enabling those who, through prejudice, have been deprived of authority to assume that epistemic authority of their own, they ask: how does one become a thinking thing? Their answers develop the individualist Cartesian conception of thought into one that is essentially dialogic, cultivated through one’s upbringing, and dependent on a political order.
Description
Proceedings of the Meeting of the Aristotelian Society held at Senate House, University of London, on 21 May 2018 at 5:30 p.m.The full text of this paper will be available in September, 2020, due to the embargo policies of The Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Contact summit@sfu.ca to enquire if the full text of the accepted manuscript can be made available to you.
Published as
Lisa Shapiro, "Assuming Epistemic Authority, or Becoming a Thinking Thing, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. cxviii, part 3 https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoy013
Publication details
Publication title
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. cxviii, part 3
Document title
Assuming Epistemic Authority, or Becoming a Thinking Thing
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Yes
Language
Member of collection