Skip to main content

Reconceiving Barriers for Democratic Health Education in Danish Schools: an Analysis of Institutional Rationales

Resource type
Date created
2017-01-16
Authors/Contributors
Abstract
Health promotion - and education researchers and practitioners advocate for more democratic approaches to school-based health education, including participatory teaching methods and the promotion of a broad and positive concept of health and health knowledge, including aspects of the German educational concept of bildung. Although Denmark, from where the data of this article are derived, has instituted policies for such approaches, their implementation in practice faces challenges. Adopting a symbolic interactionist analytical framework this paper explores and defines two powerful institutional rationales connected to formal and informal social processes and institutional purposes of schools, namely conservatism and Neoliberalism. It is empirically described and argued how these institutional rationales discourage teachers and students from including a broad and positive concept of health, the element of participation, and the promotion of general knowledge as legitimate elements in health education. This paper thus contains a perspective on health education practice, which, in a new way, contributes to explain the relatively slow progress of democratic approaches to school health education.
Document
Identifier
DOI: 10.1080/18377122.2016.1277546
Published as
Danielsen, D., Brusekius-Jensen, M. L.., & Laitsch, D. (2017). Reconceiving barriers for democratic health education in Danish schools: an analysis of institutional rationales. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education 8(1). 81-96. http://tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/18377122.2016.1277546
Publication title
Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education
Document title
Reconceiving Barriers for Democratic Health Education in Danish Schools: an Analysis of Institutional Rationales
Date
2017
Volume
8
Issue
1
First page
81
Last page
96
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Yes
Language
English
Member of collection
Download file Size
DanLaitsch-June18-2018.pdf 461.71 KB

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 0
Downloads: 0