Author: Hendrigan, Holly
Preserving oral history interviews is an important aspect of oral history practice. This article examines a sample of theses published by Canadian graduate students and asks two questions: first, how many researchers who conducted oral histories archived their interviews; second, how many researchers consulted oral history interviews as a secondary data source? Thirty-six theses from five universities were examined. 81% of the theses applied oral history as a methodology; 41% examined oral history interviews previously recorded; 22% conducted original interviews in addition to consulting previously recorded interviews. The archival rate of original interviews was 28%. Possible reasons for the low archival rate are discussed. Recent Tri-Agency funding agencies requiring Canadian scholars to adhere to new open access policies could result in higher preservation rates of oral history interviews
Hendrigan, H. (2016). An Examination of Oral History and Archival Practices among Graduate Students in Select Canadian Comprehensive Research Universities. Oral History Forum d’histoire Orale, 36(0). Retrieved from http://www.oralhistoryforum.ca/index.php/ohf/article/view/614
Oral History Forum d’histoire Orale
An Examination of Oral History and Archival Practices among Graduate Students in Select Canadian Comprehensive Research Universities
Published article URL
Copyright is held by the author(s).
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit this work under the following conditions: You must give attribution to the work (but not in any way that suggests that the author endorses you or your use of the work); You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
Member of collection