Skip to main content

A Question of Respect: A Qualitative Text Analysis of the Canadian Parliamentary Committee Hearings on The Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act

Resource type
Date created
2017-12
Authors/Contributors
Abstract
We evaluate the Canadian parliamentary hearings on The Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act to determine whether respectful and fair deliberation occurred. Our focus is on the content, tone, and nature of each question posed by committee members in hearings in both chambers. We find that, on the whole, the vast majority of questions met this baseline, but that committee members were biased toward witnesses in agreement with their position and against witnesses in opposition to it. In addition to our substantive findings, we contribute methodological insights, including a coding scheme, for this kind of qualitative text analysis.
Document
Published as
Genevieve Fuji Johnson, Mary Burns, and Kerry Porth. (2017). "A Question of Respect: A Qualitative Text Analysis of the Canadian Parliamentary Committee Hearings on The Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act." Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 50(4), 921-953, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423917000294
Publication title
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
Document title
A Question of Respect: A Qualitative Text Analysis of the Canadian Parliamentary Committee Hearings on The Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act
Date
2017
Volume
50
Issue
4
First page
921
Last page
953
Publisher DOI
10.1017/S0008423917000294
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Yes
Language
English
Member of collection

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 0
Downloads: 0