Skip to main content

Research Openness in Canadian Political Science: Toward an Inclusive and Differentiated Discussion

Resource type
Date created
2017-03
Authors/Contributors
Abstract
In this paper, we initiate a discussion within the Canadian political science community about research openness and its implications for our discipline. This discussion is important because the Tri-Agency has recently released guidelines on data management and because a number of political science journals, from several subfields, have signed the Journal Editors’ Transparency Statement requiring data access and research transparency (DA-RT). As norms regarding research openness develop, an increasing number and range of journals and funding agencies may begin to implement DA-RT-type requirements. If Canadian political scientists wish to continue to participate in the global political science community, we must take careful note of and be proactive participants in the ongoing developments concerning research openness.
Document
Published as
Genevieve Fuji Johnson, Mark Pickup, Eline A. de Rooij, and Remi Leger, "Research Openness in Canadian Political Science: Toward an Inclusive and Differentiated Discussion," Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 50 (March 2017): 311-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423917000026
Publication title
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
Document title
Research Openness in Canadian Political Science: Toward an Inclusive and Differentiated Discussion
Date
2017
Volume
50
First page
311
Last page
328
Publisher DOI
10.1017/S0008423917000026
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Yes
Language
English
Member of collection

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 0
Downloads: 0