There are a number of major pipeline projects proposed or under construction in Canada. In order to ensure long-term sustainability, Canada must have an effective pipeline environmental assessment process. This study assesses the current review system through a case study of a high-profile environmental assessment, the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project’s joint review process. I administered a survey on the process’ effectiveness to intervenors who cross-examined and provided evidence during the process (96 intervenors total) and I received responses from 40 intervenors, (completion rate of 42%). The majority (62%) of survey respondents felt that the joint review process was very poor overall and most respondents (73%) would not recommend modelling future reviews after the Enbridge Northern Gateway review process. Respondents also showed support for a number of reforms, such as requiring proponents to have comprehensive compensation plans, creating more specific decision-criteria, and hiring independent scientists financed by the applicant.
Copyright is held by the author.
The author granted permission for the file to be printed and for the text to be copied and pasted.
Member of collection