Managing fisheries for catch and conservation: should harvesting be adjusted to account for perceived biases in fish stock assessments?

Date created
2015-01-08
Authors/Contributors
Author: Keizer, Adam
Abstract
Information from stock assessment models is uncertain, and biased information can result in a fishery failing to meet its objectives. A retrospective pattern is a measure of uncertainty produced by a retrospective analysis that indicates that the data are inconsistent with assumptions made in the stock assessment model specification. Decision-makers may make ad hoc adjustments to harvest advice based on information from a retrospective analysis, however the ability of a fishery to meet conservation and yield objectives as a result of such an adjustment are often unknown. I use feedback simulation modelling to evaluate the performance alternative harvest control rules and adjustments in the presence of retrospective patterns. My study found no conservation benefit to using a retrospective adjustment derived from recent historic retrospective patterns, and that the adjustment comes at a cost to catch stability.
Document
Identifier
etd8865
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author.
Permissions
The author granted permission for the file to be printed and for the text to be copied and pasted.
Scholarly level
Attachment Size
etd8865_AKeizer.pdf 1.5 MB