Resource type
Date created
2011
Authors/Contributors
Author (aut): Moustafa, Tamir
Abstract
Drawing on original survey research, this study examines how lay Muslims in Malaysia understand foundational concepts in Islamic law. The survey finds a substantial disjuncture between popular legal consciousness and core epistemological commitments in Islamic legal theory. In its classic form, Islamic legal theory was marked by its commitment to pluralism and the centrality of human agency in Islamic jurisprudence. Yet in contemporary Malaysia, lay Muslims tend to understand Islamic law as being singular, fixed, and purely divine in nature, with a single ‘correct’ answer to any given question. The practical implications of these findings are demonstrated through examples of efforts by women’s-rights activists to reform family law provisions in Malaysia. The examples illustrate how popular misunderstandings of Islamic legal theory hinder the efforts of those working to reform family law codes while strengthening the hand of conservative actors wishing to maintain the status quo.
Document
Description
Tamir Moustafa homepage http://www.sfu.ca/internationalstudies/moustafa.html
Identifier
ISSN 1922-5725
Published as
Final version published in the journal Law & Social Inquiry, 38(1)(2013), 168-188. Access via publisher website here. Moustafa, Tamir. Islamic Law, Women’s Rights, and Popular Legal Consciousness in Malaysia, Simons Papers in Security and Development, No. 12/2011, School for International Studies, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, August 2011.
Publication details
Publication title
Social Inquiry
Document title
Islamic Law, Women’s Rights, and Popular Legal Consciousness in Malaysia
Date
2013
Volume
38
Issue
1
First page
168
Last page
188
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Yes
Language
English
Member of collection
Download file | Size |
---|---|
SimonsWorkingPaper12.pdf | 1.15 MB |