A degree of consensus exists among bioaccumulation scientists on the use of Trophic Magnification Factors (TMFs), which are calculated from patterns of observed tissue contaminant concentrations across a food web, as “conclusive” evidence of the bioaccumulative nature of chemicals in the environment. However, most regulatory criteria to determine whether a substance bioaccumulates rely on Bioconcentration Factors (BCFs), which are measured in single-species laboratory tests. BCFs do not account for chemical biomagnification via trophic transfer, nor do they reflect biodilution. I present the results from laboratory and field studies aimed at testing the hypothesis whether the BCF, or its field-based counterpart, the Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF) are adequate predictors of the TMF. I conclude that the BCF can be a useful predictor of the TMF for chemicals with certain characteristics (i.e., fat soluble substances), but that there are two major types of errors where the BCF does not provide accurate information about the bioaccumulative nature of chemicals in the environment.
Copyright is held by the author.
The author granted permission for the file to be printed and for the text to be copied and pasted.
Member of collection