Skip to main content

Estimating Surface Area in Early Hominins

Resource type
Date created
2011
Authors/Contributors
Author (aut): Cross, Allan
Author (aut): Collard, Mark
Abstract
Height and weight-based methods of estimating surface area have played an important role in the development of the current consensus regarding the role of thermoregulation in human evolution. However, such methods may not be reliable when applied to early hominins because their limb proportions differ markedly from those of humans. Here, we report a study in which this possibility was evaluated by comparing surface area estimates generated with the best-known height and weight-based method to estimates generated with a method that is sensitive to proportional differences. We found that the two methods yield indistinguishable estimates when applied to taxa whose limb proportions are similar to those of humans, but significantly different results when applied to taxa whose proportions differ from those of humans. We also found that the discrepancy between the estimates generated by the two methods is almost entirely attributable to inter-taxa differences in limb proportions. One corollary of these findings is that we need to reassess hypotheses about the role of thermoregulation in human evolution that have been developed with the aid of height and weight-based methods of estimating body surface area. Another is that we need to use other methods in future work on fossil hominin body surface areas.
Document
Published as
Cross A, Collard M (2011) Estimating Surface Area in Early Hominins. PLoS ONE 6(1): e16107. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016107
Publication title
PLoS ONE
Document title
Estimating Surface Area in Early Hominins
Date
2011
Volume
6
Issue
1
Publisher DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0016107
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Permissions
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit this work under the following conditions: You must give attribution to the work (but not in any way that suggests that the author endorses you or your use of the work); You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Yes
Language
English
Member of collection
Download file Size
journal.pone_.0016107.pdf 204.76 KB

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 0
Downloads: 0