Skip to main content

Commodities as an Asset Class Throughout the Financial Crisis

Date created
2011-08
Authors/Contributors
Author: Wong, Derek
Abstract
This project investigates the performance of commodities as an asset class from September 24, 2003 to June 30, 2011, in the context of its inclusion within a broader portfolio of equities and bonds. Specifically, we examined whether the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI), a fully-collateralized index of commodity futures, performed better or worse than the equity and bond marketplaces leading up to, during, and following the financial crisis of the late-2000s, and whether or not it provided any diversification benefits to a traditional portfolio. Our findings were that the GSCI outperformed U.S. bonds but generally not U.S. stocks during the study period, that it was more volatile than both traditional asset classes, offered modest diversification benefits, especially after the crisis began, and that it fared worse than equities in a review of higher moments. Canadian equity investors would have found the GSCI more appealing in a portfolio context than U.S. equity investors would have during the study period, due to a more favourable return weak performance of the U.S. Dollar. These results are in marked contrast to studies of commodity futures prior to the financial crisis, and provide a cautionary note for investors with respect to incorporating a basket of commodities that is heavily weighted in a particular commodity type, such as the GSCI, into their traditional portfolios. Nevertheless commodities clearly have maintained certain diversification benefits, especially during the worst of crisis where they have tended to outperform equities. On the other hand, an extension of the study period to include the Dotcom crisis revealed that commodities offered substantial diversification benefits to a traditional portfolio during that time. In addition, adding commodity futures to a portfolio of stocks and bonds significantly reduces downside risk, as measured by Value-at-Risk (VaR). On balance, we recommend that a basket of commodity futures be considered for inclusion into a traditional portfolio with a long-term investment horizon.
Document
Description
FRM Project-Simon Fraser University
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Permissions
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit this work under the following conditions: You must give attribution to the work (but not in any way that suggests that the author endorses you or your use of the work); You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
No
Language
English
Download file Size
FRM 2011 Simon Hutchison and Derek Wang.pdf 760.48 KB

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 0
Downloads: 1