Skip to main content

An Experimental Test for Indirect Benefits in Drosophila melanogaster

Resource type
Date created
2007
Authors/Contributors
Author (aut): Rundle, Howard
Author (aut): Odeen, Anders
Author (aut): Mooers, Arne
Abstract
Background: Despite much empirical attention, tests for indirect benefits of mate choice haverarely considered the major components of sexual and nonsexual offspring fitness relevant to apopulation. Here we use a novel experimental design to test for the existence of any indirectbenefits in a laboratory adapted population of D. melanogaster. Our experiment compared thefitness (mating success, longevity, and productivity) of individuals possessing genomes that derivedtwo generations previously from males that were either entirely successful (studs) or whollyunsuccessful (duds) at achieving mates in three subsequent rounds of mating trials.Results: Males from the stud treatment were 30% more successful on average at securing matesthan males from the dud treatment. In contrast, we found no difference between treatments inmeasures of productivity or of longevity when measured in a mixed-sex environment. In theabsence of females, however, males in the stud treatment outlived males in the dud treatment.Conclusion: Our results suggest that mating with successful males in this population provides anindirect benefit to females and that, at least in this environment, the benefit arises primarily throughthe production of more attractive male offspring. However, it is unclear whether this representssolely a traditional sexy sons benefit or whether there is an additional good genes component (withmale offspring simply allocating their surplus condition to traits that enhance their mating success).The lack of any detectable differences in female fitness between the two treatments suggests theformer, although the longevity advantage of males in the stud treatment when females were absentis consistent with the latter. Determining the effect of this indirect benefit on the evolution offemale mate preferences (or resistance) will require comparable data on the direct costs of matingwith various males, and an understanding of how these costs and benefits integrate acrossgenerations and vary among environments.
Document
Published as
BMC Evolutionary Biology 2007, 7:36 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-36
Publication title
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Document title
An Experimental Test for Indirect Benefits in Drosophila melanogaster
Date
2007
Volume
7
Issue
36
Publisher DOI
10.1186/1471-2148-7-36
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Permissions
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit this work under the following conditions: You must give attribution to the work (but not in any way that suggests that the author endorses you or your use of the work); You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Yes
Language
English
Member of collection
Download file Size
1471-2148-7-36.pdf 334.21 KB

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 0
Downloads: 0