Skip to main content

Evolution of Embryonic Developmental Period in the Marine Bird Families Alcidae and Spheniscidae: Roles for Nutrition and Predation?

Resource type
Date created
2010
Authors/Contributors
Author (aut): Hipfner, J. M
Author (aut): Gorman, Kristen
Author (aut): Vos, Rutger
Author (aut): Joy, Jeffrey
Abstract
Background: Nutrition and predation have been considered two primary agents of selection important in theevolution of avian life history traits. The relative importance of these natural selective forces in the evolution of avianembryonic developmental period (EDP) remain poorly resolved, perhaps in part because research has tended to focuson a single, high taxonomic-level group of birds: Order Passeriformes. The marine bird families Alcidae (auks) andSpheniscidae (penguins) exhibit marked variation in EDP, as well as behavioural and ecological traits ultimately linkedto EDP. Therefore, auks and penguins provide a unique opportunity to assess the natural selective basis of variation in akey life-history trait at a low taxonomic-level. We used phylogenetic comparative methods to investigate the relativeimportance of behavioural and ecological factors related to nutrition and predation in the evolution of avian EDP.Results: Three behavioural and ecological variables related to nutrition and predation risk (i.e., clutch size, activitypattern, and nesting habits) were significant predictors of residual variation in auk and penguin EDP based on modelspredicting EDP from egg mass. Species with larger clutch sizes, diurnal activity patterns, and open nests hadsignificantly shorter EDPs. Further, EDP was found to be longer among birds which forage in distant offshore waters,relative to those that foraged in near shore waters, in line with our predictions, but not significantly so.Conclusion: Current debate has emphasized predation as the primary agent of selection driving avian life historydiversification. Our results suggest that both nutrition and predation have been important selective forces in theevolution of auk and penguin EDP, and highlight the importance of considering these questions at lower taxonomicscales. We suggest that further comparative studies on lower taxonomic-level groups will continue to constructivelyinform the debate on evolutionary determinants of avian EDP, as well as other life history parameters.
Document
Published as
Hipfner et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:179
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/179
Publication title
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Document title
Evolution of Embryonic Developmental Period in the Marine Bird Families Alcidae and Spheniscidae: Roles for Nutrition and Predation?
Date
2010
Volume
10
Issue
179
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Permissions
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit this work under the following conditions: You must give attribution to the work (but not in any way that suggests that the author endorses you or your use of the work); You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Yes
Language
English
Member of collection
Download file Size
1471-2148-10-179.pdf 884.98 KB

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 0
Downloads: 0