Skip to main content

A Comparison of Five Methods for Selecting Tagging Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms

Resource type
Date created
Our goal was to compare methods for tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms (tagSNPs) withrespect to the power to detect disease association under differing haplotype-disease associationmodels. We were also interested in the effect that SNP selection samples, consisting of eithercases, controls, or a mixture, would have on power. We investigated five previously describedalgorithms for choosing tagSNPS: two that picked SNPs based on haplotype structure (Chapmanhaplotypicand Stram), two that picked SNPs based on pair-wise allelic association (Chapman-allelicand Cousin), and one control method that chose equally spaced SNPs (Zhai). In two diseaseassociatedregions from the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 simulated data, we tested theassociation between tagSNP genotype and disease over the tagSNP sets chosen by each methodfor each sampling scheme. This was repeated for 100 replicates to estimate power. The two allelicmethods chose essentially all SNPs in the region and had nearly optimal power. The two haplotypicmethods chose about half as many SNPs. The haplotypic methods had poor performance comparedto the allelic methods in both regions. We expected an improvement in power when the selectionsample contained cases; however, there was only moderate variation in power between thesampling approaches for each method. Finally, when compared to the haplotypic methods, thereference method performed as well or worse in the region with ancestral disease haplotypestructure.
Published as
BMC Genetics 2005, 6(Suppl 1):S71 doi:10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S71
Publication title
BMC Genetics
Document title
A Comparison of Five Methods for Selecting Tagging Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms
Publisher DOI
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit this work under the following conditions: You must give attribution to the work (but not in any way that suggests that the author endorses you or your use of the work); You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
Scholarly level
Peer reviewed?
Member of collection
Download file Size
1471-2156-6-S1-S71.pdf 197.93 KB

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 0
Downloads: 0