Skip to main content

An exploratory analysis of the emergence and implications of breed specific legislation: Knee-jerk reaction or warranted response?

Resource type
Thesis type
(Thesis) M.A.
Date created
The main objective of this thesis was to survey and critically analyze the increased attention and call for legislation addressing "dangerous dogs" and, more generally, animal control in urban landscapes. Breed Specific Legislation (BSL), the banning or restricting of the ownership of a dog solely based on the dog's breed regardless of the dog's aggressiveness, was one suggestion put forward in response to the perceived "dog bite" problem. By examining the history and origin of BSL, an understanding of the legislation and its intended function emerged. In particular, the perception that Breed Specific Legislation is a knee jerk response or a quick regulatory reaction to media amplification, claimsmakers' protest and public outcry over the "dog bite" problem was explored. Research benefits include an analysis of the BSL debate, an exploration of the opinions of major stakeholders, an examination of alternative methods of animal control and a call for evidence-based policy.
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author.
The author has not granted permission for the file to be printed nor for the text to be copied and pasted. If you would like a printable copy of this thesis, please contact
Scholarly level
Member of collection
Download file Size
etd2000.pdf 2.58 MB

Views & downloads - as of June 2023

Views: 127
Downloads: 3