In search of balance: must Canadians choose between security & freedom?

Author: 
Date created: 
2008
Keywords: 
National security
Democracy
Legislative oversight
Civil rights -- Canada
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Canadian Security Intelligence Service
Canada
National security
Oversight
Civil rights
Terrorism
Abstract: 

The problem this work will examine is the democratic deficit that currently exists in Canada in relation to oversight of the national security program. It is argued that the bodies tasked with monitoring security and intelligence activities are incapable of acting as an effective check on state power due to persistent under-resourcing and the absence of authority to issue binding recommendations. This project will present a legislative based oversight model that has the capacity to mitigate the risk posed by counter-terrorism investigations. As confidence in the existing oversight framework has been severely eroded as a result of the mishandling of the investigation involving Maher Arar it is clear the time has come to establish an accountability regime capable of ensuring that agencies are conducting security operations in a manner in harmony with the rule of law and international human rights standards.

Description: 
The author has placed restrictions on the PDF copy of this thesis. The PDF is not printable nor copyable. If you would like the SFU Library to attempt to contact the author to get permission to print a copy, please email your request to summit-permissions@sfu.ca.
Language: 
English
Document type: 
Thesis
Rights: 
Copyright remains with the author
File(s): 
Senior supervisor: 
S
Department: 
Dept. of Political Science - Simon Fraser University
Thesis type: 
Thesis (M.A.)
Statistics: