An approach to analyzing case-control screening data with an application to digital rectal exam and metastatic prostate cancer

Date created: 

Prostate cancer (PC) is a prominent killer; men over 40 should receive annual digital rectal exam (DRE) to prevent metastatic prostate cancer (MPC). For rare outcomes like MPC, case-control studies are common. Previous studies counted DREs as dichotomous and compared cases/controls using conditional logistic regression and the case-control odds ratio. Observation time for DRE ends at PC since afterwards DREs are diagnostic. Cases and controls are matched on time; but when cases are screen-detected there is bias counting more case screenings. Excluding tests shortly before diagnosis only reverses the bias. We begin instead with a life table for first DRE, stratified by case/control and propensity score (representing confounders), from which the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio is calculated for case/control versus DRE on tables cross-classifying these, stratified by interval and propensity score. We find a mildly protective effect (OR=0.861, 95% CI=0.611,1.215), and find the approach superior to those used in previous studies.

The author has placed restrictions on the PDF copy of this thesis. The PDF is not printable nor copyable. If you would like the SFU Library to attempt to contact the author to get permission to print a copy, please email your request to
Document type: 
Copyright remains with the author
Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science - Simon Fraser University
Thesis type: 
Project (M.Sc.)