The economics of children’s mental health

Peer reviewed: 
No, item is not peer reviewed.
Scholarly level: 
Faculty/Staff
Final version published as: 

Schwartz, C., Waddell, C., Barican, J., Zuberbier, O., Nightingale, L., & Gray-Grant, D. (2009). The economics of children’s mental health. Children’s Mental Health Research Quarterly, 3(1), 1–16. Vancouver, BC: Children’s Health Policy Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University.

https://childhealthpolicy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/RQ-1-09-Winter.pdf

Date created: 
2009
Abstract: 

Background: There is an increasing push towards policy-makers approving interventions for childhood mental disorders based on clinical effectiveness and cost considerations. To this end, high-quality economic evaluations of these interventions are starting to accumulate. Consequently, we set out to review the available data to help determine which prevention programs constitute the wisest use of limited public funds.

Methods: We used systematic review methods to identify randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluations of mental disorder prevention programs that also had an economic evaluation. Applying our inclusion criteria, we accepted four RCTs.

Results: Coping With Stress resulted in significantly more depression-free days for participants with an average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of id="mce_marker"0 per depression-free day.  Fast Track significantly lowered the incidence of conduct disorder but only among the high-risk children. However, the cost per averted case of conduct disorder was still more than $752,000 for this group of children. Nurse Home Visitation resulted in significantly fewer serious behavioural problems many years after the program ended, including fewer criminal convictions. It also resulted in a net saving among the highest risk families by reducing other service use. Finally, Perry Preschool similarly resulted in less criminal activity as well as higher educational achievement and employment earning years after the program ended. It also produced a net savings.

Conclusions: Prevention programs can not only avert needless suffering for children and families, they can also produce cost-savings for society. 

Language: 
English
Rights: 
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit this work under the following conditions: You must give attribution to the work (but not in any way that suggests that the author endorses you or your use of the work); You may not use this work for commercial purposes; You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any further uses require the permission of the rights holder (or author if no rights holder is listed). These rights are based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License.
Statistics: