Men’s Discourses of Help‐seeking in the Context of Depression

Peer reviewed: 
Yes, item is peer reviewed.
Scholarly level: 
Faculty/Staff
Final version published as: 

Johnson, J. L., Oliffe, J. L., Kelly, M. T., Galdas, P. and Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (2012), Men’s discourses of help‐seeking in the context of depression. Sociology of Health & Illness, 34: 345-361.

doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01372.x

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01372.x

Date created: 
2011-06-27
Identifier: 
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01372.x
Keywords: 
Masculinities
Depression
Help‐seeking
Discourse
Qualitative
Abstract: 

Depression is an illness increasingly constructed as a gendered mood disorder and consequently diagnosed in women more than men. The diagnostic criteria used for its assessment often perpetrate and reproduce gender stereotypes. The stigma associated with mental illness and the gendered elements of depression suggest there are likely numerous discourses that position, explain, and justify help‐seeking practices. This qualitative study explored men’s discourses of seeking help for depression. The methodological approach was informed by a social constructionist perspective of language, discourse and gender that drew on methods from discourse analysis. We conducted individual in‐depth, semi‐structured interviews with 38 men with depression, either formally diagnosed or self reported. The analysis revealed five discursive frames that influenced the men’s talk about help‐seeking and depression: manly self‐reliance; treatment‐seeking as responsible independent action; guarded vulnerability; desperation; and genuine connection. The findings are discussed within a broader context of social discourses of gender, the limitations of current help‐seeking literature and the evidence for how men seek help in ways that extend traditional notions of medical treatment.

Language: 
English
Document type: 
Article
Rights: 
Rights remain with the authors.
File(s): 
Sponsor(s): 
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Michael Smith Foundation
Statistics: