New Summit website coming in May 2021!

                   Check the SFU library website for updates.

Conducting a Critical Interpretive Synthesis on Poppers Literature: The influence of the medical model of health on our understanding of alkyl nitrites

Peer reviewed: 
No, item is not peer reviewed.
Scholarly level: 
Graduate student (Masters)
Date created: 
Alkyl nitrites
Critical interpretive synthesis
Queer health
Gay men’s health

Poppers (alkyl nitrites) are vasodilators used by many gay men to relieve pain, enhance pleasure, and facilitate penetration during sex. Poppers have been studied by medical researchers since the 1980s, yet community-based and qualitative research remain uncommon. I conducted a critical interpretive synthesis examining the ways that the dominant medical model of health is influencing poppers literature. Analysis was performed using close coding of five papers, resulting in two constructs termed “responsible action” and “risk ratchetting”. Responsible action describes a bias in poppers research, resulting from researchers’ own senses of duty. Researcher duty is motivated not just by objective measures of risk, but by harmful stereotypes of gay men and people who use drugs. Risk ratcheting refers to aspects of academia that result in exaggeration of poppers-related risk over time. These constructs may provide a lens to more critically understand the poppers literature, and other bodies of marginal drug literature.

Document type: 
Graduating extended essay / Research project
Rights remain with the author.
Malcolm Steinberg
Faculty of Health Sciences - Simon Fraser University
Thesis type: 
Project (M.P.H.)