The Judicialization of Religion

Author: 
Peer reviewed: 
Yes, item is peer reviewed.
Scholarly level: 
Faculty/Staff
Final version published as: 

The Judicialization of Religion” Law & Society Review, vol. 52 (2018) 685-708. DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12350

Date created: 
2018-10-03
Keywords: 
Islam
Liberal rights
Malaysia
Constitutional law
Judicialization
Right constestation
Legal mobilization
Religion
Abstract: 

Throughout the second half of the twentieth century, one Muslim-majority country after another adopted constitutional provisions meant to incorporate Islam into the legal order. In what is now a familiar pattern, leaders sought to harness the legitimating power of Islamic symbolism. But rather than shore up state legitimacy, these provisions opened new avenues of contestation.

In countries where judicial institutions are robust, religion of the state clauses have helped to catalyze a “judicialization of religion,” wherein courts were made to authorize an “official” religion and/or render judgment on the appropriate place for religion in the political order. This study theorizes one aspect of the judicialization of religion through the illustrative case study of Malaysia. The study examines how shifting political context provided opportunities for activist lawyers to advance sweeping new interpretations of Malaysia’s Religion of the Federation clause and, with it, a new vision for state and society.

Description: 

The full text of this paper will be available in October 2020 due to the embargo policies of Law & Society Review. Contact summit@sfu.ca to enquire if the full text of the accepted manuscript can be made available to you.

Language: 
English
Document type: 
Article
Rights: 
Rights remain with the author.
Statistics: