Environmental Complexity and Stakeholder Theory in Formal Research Network Evaluations

Peer reviewed: 
Yes, item is peer reviewed.
Scholarly level: 
Faculty/Staff
Final version published as: 

Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, Volume 30, Issue 3, 2012 pp 291-314.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2012.727276

Date created: 
2012
Abstract: 

Governments in OECD countries are turning more and more towards creating networked entities as a means of organising cross-sector and multidisciplinary research. Yet, there is little discussion of how such networks operate and how they differ in evaluation terms from other research entities (individuals and organisations). This particularly relates to the policy objectives of networks. In this paper, we use the literature on evaluation, impact and value as a lens through which to focus on the nature and benefits of formal research networks. This paper seeks to refine our concepts of research networks and, in defining the concept of formal research networks, to map the policy issues in evaluating networks. We argue that, to do this, it is important that two extant literatures (stakeholder theory and organisational environments) be introduced into the analysis of network operations. We focus particularly on the significance of environmental complexity for network evaluation.

Description: 

This article can be accessed from the publisher at

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2012.727276

Language: 
English
Document type: 
Article
Statistics: